Accuracy of 3D printed models and implant-analog positions according to the implant-analog–holder offset, inner structure, and printing layer thickness: an in-vitro study
Accuracy of 3D printed models and implant-analog positions according to the implant-analog–holder offset, inner structure, and printing layer thickness: an in-vitro study
This study examined how three key design parameters (implant-analog-holder offset, inner structure, and printing layer thickness) influence the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed dental implant models. Twelve experimental groups were fabricated using an LCD printer and digitized with a laboratory scanner, with trueness, precision, angular distortion, depth deviation, and linear distortion evaluated via three-way ANOVA. Results demonstrated that an IAH offset of 0.06 mm, hollow inner structure, and 100 µm layer thickness collectively yielded the highest positional accuracy and minimal implant-analog deviation. These findings provide clinically actionable printing parameters for optimizing the fabrication of implant-level working models in digital prosthodontic workflows.
This study examined how three key design parameters (implant-analog-holder offset, inner structure, and printing layer thickness) influence the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed dental implant models. Twelve experimental groups were fabricated using an LCD printer and digitized with a laboratory scanner, with trueness, precision, angular distortion, depth deviation, and linear distortion evaluated via three-way ANOVA. Results demonstrated that an IAH offset of 0.06 mm, hollow inner structure, and 100 µm layer thickness collectively yielded the highest positional accuracy and minimal implant-analog deviation. These findings provide clinically actionable printing parameters for optimizing the fabrication of implant-level working models in digital prosthodontic workflows.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine how the implant-analog-holder (IAH) offset, inner structure, and printing layer thickness influence the overall accuracy and local implant-analog positional changes of 3D printed dental models.
Methods: Specimens in 12 experimental groups (8 specimens per group) with different IAH offsets, inner structures, and printing layer thicknesses were printed in three dimensions using an LCD printer (Phrozen Shuffle) and digitized by a laboratory scanner (Identica T500). The trueness and precision of the printed model as well as the angular distortion, depth deviation, and linear distortion of the implant analog were evaluated using three-way ANOVA.
Results: The positional accuracy was significantly higher for IAH offsets of 0.04 mm and 0.06 mm than for one of 0.08 mm, for a hollow than a solid inner structure, and for a printing layer thickness of 100 µm than for one of 50 µm (all P<.001).
Conclusions: The accuracies of the 3D printed models and the implant-analog positions were significantly affected by the IAH offset, inner structure, and printing layer thickness.
Clinical significance: Given the observation of this study, premeditating the IAH offset of 0.06 mm, hollow inner structure, and printing layer thickness of 100 µm before printing can help clinicians reach the optimum overall printing accuracy and minimum the local positional changes of the implant-analogs.


